‘Deceptively worded’ Michigan election proposal will effectively ‘ban’ voter ID in the state, critics say

Michigan voters will be presented with a ballot measure in the upcoming midterm election that critics at Fox News Digital say is being packaged by supporters as voter protections, but is actually a measure that effectively bans true voter ID laws and opens the state to voter fraud.

Voters will head to the Michigan polls on Tuesday to determine the fate of michigan proposal 2, backed by voting rights group Promote the Vote, which has described the measure as a constitutional amendment that enshrines voter protections, including voter ID, in the state constitution and “recognizes a fundamental right to vote without harassing behavior.”

Critics of the measure, including Jason Snead, executive director of the Honest Elections Project, told Fox News Digital that the measure will effectively ban photo ID requirements at polling stations. Currently, Michigan voters are required by law to provide photo ID or sign an affidavit stating who they are. If this current law is written into the state constitution, which Proposition 2 would do, critics say any law introducing mandatory photo identification would be unconstitutional and therefore effectively prohibited.

FLORIDA OFFICIALS ACCUSE WOMAN OF CRIME FRAUD FOR VOTING DURING SEVERAL ELECTIONS IN TWO STATES

A voter casts a ballot at a polling station in Detroit, Michigan on March 10, 2020.

A voter casts a ballot at a polling station in Detroit, Michigan on March 10, 2020.
(Erin Kirkland/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

“Promote the Vote takes the existing law, which has a big exception with this affidavit, which essentially swallows the rule so it’s optional photo ID and not a requirement to show photo ID, and they’re putting it in the.” Constitution and such will prevent the legislature from ever actually requiring it,” Snead told Fox News Digital.

Hans von Spakovsky, senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation’s Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, told Fox News Digital he agrees with Snead’s conclusion that any future law requiring voters to produce photo ID would be unconstitutional if the proposal would be accepted.

“It invalidates ID requirements by saying that any voter can vote if he or she simply signs a form claiming they are who they say they are,” von Spakovsky said. “The proposal is misleadingly worded to make voters think they are voting for ID, which the sponsors hope voters won’t notice, which means you can bypass it with a signature.”

A SIMPLE GUIDE TO MIDDLE ELECTIONS, THEIR IMPACT ON THE PRESIDENTIALITY AND MORE

Snead told Fox News Digital that legislation is currently under discussion in the state that would require photo identification to vote, known as Secure MI Vote, and if that legislation were approved, it would be blocked by the passage of Proposal 2.

“They are looking at ways to stop this, and the Promote the Vote voting action would replace and neutralize a significant portion of Secure MI Vote, including requiring photo ID to be taken on all votes,” Snead said.

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Promote the Vote said their proposal was “an impartial electoral reform proposal supported by Republicans, Democrats and independents, local employees, the League of Women Voters, faith leaders, business groups like the Detroit Regional Chamber and the disabled.” becomes rights groups.”

THE DIVIDED MICHIGAN STATE raises many questions about this year’s election. HERE’S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

A voter enters a polling station.

A voter enters a polling station.
(iStock)

“It is sad that special interest front groups from Washington, DC are spreading lies and misinformation about Proposal 2,” the group said. “The fact is, Proposal 2 increases election security by incorporating Michigan’s current Voter ID Act into our state constitution. According to the Michigan Secretary of State, 99.8% of Michigan voters currently show photo ID when voting in Michigan, and that won’t change under Proposition 2.”

The group added that the proposal “specifically requires identity verification of every single vote cast, and every voter who casts a vote in person will be asked to provide photo identification — a strict requirement that is comparable to or more stringent than 37 other states and DC.” .

“The truth is that Proposal 2 will make voting safer and more accessible for the elderly, rural voters, people with disabilities, working parents, and will help get the votes counted for our military members serving overseas.”

TIKTOK BY ELECTION DAY: MORE DEMOCRATS Mocked FOR CRINGWORTHY GET-OUT-THE-VOTE VIDEOS

Dorothy Melvin, center, enlists help from Charline Kilpatrick in Tennessee to get a photo license valid at polling stations.

Dorothy Melvin, center, enlists help from Charline Kilpatrick in Tennessee to get a photo license valid at polling stations.
(AP)

Snead told Fox News Digital that Promote the Vote’s statement was a tacit admission that strict voter IDs are effectively banned in the state.

“Promote the Vote does not dispute that Proposal 2 prohibits the implementation of genuine photo ID requirements,” Snead said. “In fact, the Declaration all but admits this. Promote the Vote recognizes that they enshrine applicable law in the Constitution. This law specifically permits voting without ID, and if Proposition 2 is passed, it would be unconstitutional to require someone to show photo ID when voting — in other words, requiring photo ID would be prohibited.”

Three former Michigan secretaries of state have also joined opposition to the election proposal. tells KTVI-TV Late last month that the measure will remove voter protections not just limited to voter ID.

MILWAUKEE ELECTION OFFICIAL FOUND FOR ALLEGED FRAUDULENT REQUEST FOR MILITARY VOTES

“This is a recipe for voter fraud,” Candice Miller, Michigan’s Republican secretary of state from 1995 to 2003, told the outlet.

“The TV ad is the most misleading I’ve ever seen,” Republican Michigan State Senator Ruth Johnson said of the proposal. “They’ve spent a lot of money telling us the ID will go into our constitution, but what they forget to say is there’s a little ‘or’… they’re naming all these different IDs that you use can, or none at all.”

FINAL COUNTDOWN: HERE’S AT THE GAME IN NEXT WEEK’S MIRONAL ELECTION

Snead also pointed out that he could not verify Promote the Vote’s claim that “99.8% of voters in Michigan currently show photo ID when they go to vote,” but said that even if it were true , is highly misleading.

“This number can only apply to in-person voting because Michigan ballot-by-mail law uses signature verification (and Proposition 2 also enshrines signature verification for ballot-by-mail in the Constitution),” Snead said via email. “So far this year, over 919,000 Michiganders have cast absentee ballots — none of whom have had to show a photocopy, driver’s license, or state ID number with their ballots. According to the EAC (p. 29), in 2020 nearly half of those Michigan voters cast absentee ballots.”

Snead added that the proportion of absentee voters is likely to increase over time, and Proposal 2 creates a “permanent absentee ballot list that encourages more and more people to vote by mail.”

“Arizona, for example, has had a permanent early voting list for some time and in 2020 nearly 87% of voters voted using EAC data by mail. Therefore, 99.8% of in-person voters can still voluntarily give their IDs, but there will be fewer and fewer in-person voters over time.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Snead told Fox News Digital that Promote the Vote is very much a far-left push to undermine electoral integrity across the country, and while the group “says they’re fighting for the right to vote,” one only needs to look at “the view agenda”. they are pushing” and “when you look at the sources of funding behind it, the vote clearly promotes a left-wing organization

source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *